A review of current education industry topics from the publisher of Learning A–Z

“Every day I make an effort to go toward what I don't understand. This wandering leads to the accidental learning that continually shapes my life.”
Yo-Yo Ma, cellist

Bob Holl is the co-founder and VP/Publisher of Learning A–Z. His passion is creating and delivering high-quality educational resources that help teachers help kids learn.

Tuesday, October 16, 2007

Combating the Fourth-Grade Slump

Educators have long recognized what the late Jean Chall of Harvard University has called the fourth-grade slump. For reasons not entirely known, fourth-graders, sometime between becoming decoders and comprehenders of text, run into reading difficulty. It has been surmised that if we can zero in on the causes of this slump, preventive and/or corrective action can be taken.

That's why the federal government has set aside $30 million to fund a five-year research project to help shed light on the fourth-grade slump. The government's funding of this project is being fueled by interest in Response to Intervention (RTI), a framework in which teachers provide increased intervention for students who have been identified as strugglers. The framework is designed to identify children with learning disabilities so further, more intensive, intervention measures can be administered.

It is not surprising that Chall found the slump was worse with poor children. She suggested the slump was due to the lack of a vocabulary-rich environment. I suspect a lot has to do with the possibility that once we think we have taught kids to decode, we stop teaching reading. Even though kids can decode, we need to teach them the skills and strategies necessary to comprehend text. This is why, at Learning A–Z, every leveled book lesson focuses on key comprehension skills and strategies along with vocabulary development.

If the research can help us better develop instruction for kids who have mastered the code but still struggle to understand what they read, the $30 million will be well spent. Goodness knows we spend far more on social programs for those who drop out because they just don't get it.

Comments

I think your assessment about the lack of a vocabulary-rich environment is so true. When we closely examine traditional 4th grade reading materials, it is easy to see the jump in complexity from 3rd to 4th grade texts. The jump mainly consists of the addition of content-rich vocabulary, evident in science and social studies books.
I think we need to develop "transitional third" grade materials for teachers to use in the second half of the 3rd grade year for guided reading lessons to prepare their students for the reading demands of 4th grade.

Take a close look at MRI brain research and you will discover that the parts of the brain used for oral reading and for silent reading/comprehension are NOT identical.

With all this emphasis on phonics, we should not be at all surprised that kids can say the words without having a clue what reading really is. Most recently I have encountered this phenomenon here in China with students who can decode because many Pinyin letters (not all) are close to English sounds.

Also, the craze about starting absolutely every child with phonics dooms the 15-20 % of our population who are dyslexic. They are generally lacking in phonemic awareness and would be much better served by a basal reading approach that scaffolds reading vocabulary from a constant, repetitive core, building phonics in as it goes.

(For much more opinionated observations from me,check the Learning Disabilities Resource Community website.

Reading, like education, has become a huge business and teachers no longer are given the right to chose materials that are suitable to the children in their classes.

Given my considerable experience in classrooms at all age levels in five countries, I would suggest that panacea would be to use Ashton-Warner's approach using vocab critical to either the child or the culture group of the child.

Am using above with kids here, implementing phrases instead of isolated words so that everything hinges on the MEANING of the language we are speaking/reading. The phrases are designed to avoid the syntax errors common to Asian ESL speakers. Seems to be working very efficiently. I build these phrases around toys/activities that are important to the kids and to our group.

We read books we have created ourselves.

So far so good.

US research is faulty. Look at the research design for "Breakthrough to Literacy" for instance. The study group will be provided all the Breakthrough stuff and the "control" group will continue on with "same old-same old"...I would like to see Breakthrough pitted against a basal reader approach that uses new material that is as well financed as the BTL stuff; now THAT might reveal something worthwhile... As it is, any results that favour BTL can be ascribed to Hawthorne Effect; one group gets all the special attention; the "control" gets nothing.

I do wish elementary teachers were allowed to think... We might spare a lot of children a lot of pain.

Ann Thompson

It is so comforting to see that you are making teachers and administrators aware that all children do not learn to read through the phonics method. And by the way, many of these children are not deslexic. I have found that just giving children a lot of materials to read at their instructional level supports those students who have difficulty hearing and blending the sounds.

You made some Good points there. I did a search on the topic and found most people will agree.

Post a comment

Comments are moderated, and will not appear on this weblog until the author has approved them.

Remember personal info?